Matching Diagnostics
Description
Environment
None
Activity
Show:
David Nolen June 16, 2013 at 7:57 PM
Lowering priority. Happy to take a patch, but I don't think I'll be looking into this myself in the near future.
Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant September 30, 2011 at 10:39 AM
I haven't yet kept up with your backtracking changes, and I just noticed this conversation, so I'll have to have another look at diagnostics with backtracking.
David Nolen September 26, 2011 at 1:10 PM
Matching diagnostics will be complicated by MATCH-1. Clojure doesn't yet support simple data conveying exceptions. Will probably have to use a combination of proxy and definterface.
David Nolen September 5, 2011 at 4:40 PM
Continuing the conversation from GitHub - concerning your changes, we should probably show what current occurrence failed to match as well as the breadcrumb.
Details
Details
Assignee
David NolenReporter
David NolenPriority
MinorCreated September 4, 2011 at 3:54 PM
Updated June 16, 2013 at 7:57 PM
Communicate to the user precisely what failed to match. Conversation here: http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/browse_thread/thread/675456fba1712214. We adopt the behavior of condp since that is closer to what match does and will do (predicate dispatch)