How About Default Implementations on Protocols
Description
Environment
None
Activity
Show:
importOctober 12, 2014 at 6:36 PM
Comment made by: mobiusinversion
I agree, this is a low priority enhancement. I think it could make the Protocol experience more DWIMy, and Java 8 has default implementations on interfaces for the same kind of convenience.
Jozef WagnerOctober 12, 2014 at 7:01 AM
I don't think we need it. What's the rationale behind extending some protocol, not implementing its methods, and then calling those methods, expecting them not to throw. Be explicit about what yout type should do, whether it is a default or custom behavior. You basically have three options
or
or
I think however that my first approach is unidiomatic and you should prefer the latter ones.
importOctober 12, 2014 at 2:48 AM
Comment made by: mobiusinversion
As it stands you have to workaround with this
Details
Assignee
UnassignedUnassignedReporter
importimportPriority
Minor
Details
Details
Assignee
Unassigned
UnassignedReporter
import
importPriority
Created October 12, 2014 at 2:46 AM
Updated May 15, 2017 at 10:26 PM
Consider this example
What about the default implementation.