cljs.closure/build does not find upstream dependencies when called from worker thread

Description

Example stacktrace: https://www.refheap.com/97198 (context is using figwheel in a clojure REPL from CIDER)

Because cljs.closure/build calls the 0-arity form of get-upstream-deps, it is implicitly using the current thread's classloader to find the deps.cljs resources. It is then assoc'ing the result into opts, so the caller has no way of gathering the dependencies themselves and passing them in.

Environment

None

Activity

Show:
Michael Griffiths
February 16, 2015, 4:10 PM

Chas: yes, the proposed patch simply moves the responsibility to the caller. I was under the assumption that changing how get-upstream-deps/build resolves the classloader by default would be too-breaking of a change, and had not even considered the fact that this might be a broader issue with nREPL itself.

Example usage of get-upstream-deps in the wild (that even mentions classloader issues): https://github.com/immutant/immutant-release/blob/ea538feb548bde86ebce20ec679da7a19b639259/integration-tests/apps/ring/basic-ring/src/basic_ring/core.clj#L51

Note that Weasel (at least) is currently gathering the upstream deps itself too: https://github.com/tomjakubowski/weasel/commit/5cd7009f584100f0d89fc7f00079458bb1f2c016

I'll set up an example project tonight if you like, but I think all you need is to add [cljsjs/react "0.12.2-5"] as a dependency to an existing cljs project and then require [cljsjs.react] in one of its namespaces.

Bruce Hauman
February 16, 2015, 7:04 PM

Chas, David here is a very quick example:

If you do a

Assuming lein repl started an nREPL repl. This will produce the error mentioned above. The problem is that om is utilizing the new deps.js facility to autmatically import cljsjs.react. get-upstream-deps depends on being run on the main thread.

https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/blob/master/src/clj/cljs/closure.clj#L1116

A solution that fixes this in get-upstream-deps* would be preferable.

Is this simple solution to use the system classloader when not on the main thread:

To naive? My experience with Java threads and classloaders is minimal.

Or should we always use the (java.lang.ClassLoader/getSystemClassLoader) in this case?

Chas Emerick
February 17, 2015, 9:35 PM

Using the system classloader isn't necessary. get-upstream-deps is currently using .findResources, not .getResources; the difference is that the former looks only for matching resources in the target classloader, while the latter first delegates to the parent classloader, and only looks locally if nothing is found there. So, just using .getResources instead will make all current usage work as expected, I think. e.g.

There are some classloader edge cases that might motivate making get-upstream-deps perform a more comprehensive search, explicitly pinging all classloaders for matching resources. This is sometimes necessary for these sorts of scanning scenarios if e.g. a deps.cljs file is available via a parent classloader, which will therefore "shadow" other deps.cljs files in child classloaders. In that case, you need something like cemerick.pomegranate/resources.

Hope that helps.

David Nolen
February 17, 2015, 9:46 PM

Chas's suggested fix has been committed to master. It works on the simple tests I've run but I'd like to hear more confirmation. Thanks everyone.

https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/commit/79208f5bf15825a2ba2d0ce95aae6d2b71966494

David Nolen
February 20, 2015, 10:36 PM

Closing this one. Chas's solution is the correct one.

Assignee

Unassigned

Reporter

Michael Griffiths

Approval

None

Patch

None

Priority

Major
Configure